Miriana Tona vs Carolina Meligeni Alves Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Oct at 05:06 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Tona vs C. Meligeni Alves

ITA
3
Win
Played
2
Win

BRA
3
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Tona 3 - 2 Alves
They have played 10 sets in total, with Miriana Tona winning 6 and Carolina Meligeni Alves winning 4. The last match between Carolina Meligeni Alves and Miriana Tona was at the W35 Sao Paulo, 03-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Carolina Meligeni Alves getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tona | 3 |
| Alves | 2 |
Last 5 H2H Matches:
(QF) W35 Sao Paulo(10-03-25)
(F) W35 Sao Paulo(04-13-25)
(R2) W50 Vacaria(03-20-25)
M. Tona vs C. M. Alves H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,110 | Career Prize Money | $130,308 |
| 53.32% (233-204) | Career Total W/L | 57.78% (442-323) |
| 3 | Clay | 2 |
| 2 | Titles | 8 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
M. Tona vs C. M. Alves Match Preview:
- Miriana Tona's recent second serve performance has been ineffective, failing to win any points, while Carolina Meligeni Alves has achieved a 39.95% success rate. Could this indicate a significant edge for Alves? Indeed, it reflects a robust second serve game in contrast to Tona.
- When assessing return games, Miriana Tona has not secured any points on opponent second serves recently, whereas Carolina Meligeni Alves has excelled with a 48.87% success rate. Furthermore, on first serves, Alves again outperforms Tona with 34.65% compared to her opponent's 0%. These stats suggest Alves has a superior return game.
- In pressure scenarios, Tona has yet to save a breakpoint, while Alves has done so with a 49.07% success rate. This could imply that Alves is more poised under pressure.
- Over the last year, Carolina Meligeni Alves holds a notable winning percentage of 60.81% across her matches, compared to Tona's record of not having competed. Could previous consistent play suggest an advantage? It's plausible.
- Alves demonstrates a strong preference for clay courts, winning 395 of her 659 matches on this surface. Her win rate drops off on grass. Understanding surface preferences can clarify the odds; here, proficiency on clay may benefit Alves.
- Alves has been more active and successful in the last year, engaging mostly in Challengers/ITF events and showing a winning rate of 64.62%, unlike Tona, who lacks recent match play data.
- Who has the advantage in head-to-head encounters? Although Tona leads 3-1 in their previous meetings, current statistics suggest Alves has improved significantly.
- Alves has faced opponents with an average ranking of around 397.41, providing her with more match play against a defined competitive field, unlike Tona.
- In deciding sets, which often reveal a player’s resilience, Alves has won 57% of such instances over the past year compared to Tona's 0% success rate, hinting she might handle tight situations better.
Editorial Prediction (October 3, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance metrics shows a clear superiority for Carolina Meligeni Alves, notably in her second serve success rate and return game reliability. In contrast, Miriana Tona's current statistics reflect a lack of competitive play and successful outcomes.
While Miriana Tona has a favorable head-to-head history against Alves, the recent trends indicate significant improvement and consistency on Alves' part, particularly under pressure and in return games.
The preference for clay courts aligns with Alves' strong suit, adding to her advantage in this anticipated match. With a significantly better performance in deciding sets, the predictive analysis favors Alves for those scenarios that reach critical points.
Considering all these elements, while historical encounters have seen Tona generally in charge, current form and statistical insights imply that Carolina Meligeni Alves is the more likely victor for this upcoming match.
Miriana Tona vs Carolina Meligeni Alves Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Tona vs C. M. Alves H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 51 | Games Won | 46 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 17 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1:43:12 | Average Match Time | 1:43:12 |
| 65% (237/366) | 1st Serve % | 64% (195/306) |
| 63% (150/237) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (123/195) |
| 44% (57/129) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (51/111) |
| 47% (16/34) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (13/65) |
| 43% (132/306) | Return Points Win % | 43% (159/366) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Tona Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 0-6 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(4) 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
C. M. Alves Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(6) 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
F | L | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | ||

M. Tona vs C. M. Alves Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.32% (233/204) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.78% (442/323) |
| 54.16% (527/446) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.54% (981/754) |
| 51.97% (4376/4045) | Games Win/Loss | 53.05% (8312/7357) |
| 51.28% (40/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.09% (41/52) |
| 54.52% (175/146) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.91% (399/267) |
| 47.37% (18/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 549 | Aces Total | 516 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1379 | Total Double Faults | 1436 |
| 1:16:55 | Average Match Time | 1:24:58 |
| 486.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 527.81 |
| 61% (13050/21226) | 1st Serve % | 69% (28331/41086) |
| 61% (7918/13050) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (16549/28331) |
| 44% (3608/8176) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5851/12755) |
| 50% (1402/2803) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2847/5666) |
| 47% (9930/21063) | Return Points Win % | 48% (20050/41696) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 70.00% (7/3) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 34.62% (9/17) |
| 53.37% (95/83) | Challenger W/L | 55.17% (267/217) |
| 53.54% (136/118) | Futures W/L | 66.52% (155/78) |
| 53% (227/428) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (433/754) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 52% (28/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (74/142) |
| 39% (42/109) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (105/206) |
| 85% (249/212) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (434/382) |
| 15% (249/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (434/52) |
| 11% (187/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (331/58) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
